Close Menu
    What's Hot

    Jaishankar meets Russian FM Lavrov in Atlanta, discusses Ukraine, West Asia situation

    EAM Jaishankar calls for “right to industrialise”, resisting predatory practices in supply chains at G20

    Israeli opposition leader Eisenkot sets conditions for coalition, vows to use Knesset majority to reverse Netanyahu policies

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Contact Us
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Globe FilesGlobe Files
    • Home
    • Asia
    • Exclusive
    • Europe
    • Pacific
    • Middle East
    • Usa
    Subscribe
    Globe FilesGlobe Files
    Home»Others»Alberta awaits referendum results after voting delays, separation question in focus
    Others

    Alberta awaits referendum results after voting delays, separation question in focus

    Shivam SainiBy Shivam SainiOctober 20, 2026Updated:October 31, 2026No Comments4 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
    Follow Us
    Google News Flipboard
    Supporters of the Forever Canadian group, who want Alberta to remain in Canada, sit as they wait for the results (Photo/Reuters)
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

    Alberta [Canada], October 20 (ANI): Canada’s Alberta province is awaiting the results of a 10-question referendum covering separation from Canada, immigration policies and constitutional changes, with voting delays pushing back the expected announcement of results, according to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC).

    More than 100 voting locations remained open beyond the scheduled closing time of 8 pm (local time) on Monday due to delays, meaning results were not expected until at least 10 pm Mountain Time, CBC reported.

    The referendum, held on Monday (local time), asked voters to weigh in on a range of issues, including whether Alberta should remain part of Canada or begin the process of holding a binding vote on separation.

    The 10th question on the ballot asked, “Should Alberta remain a province of Canada, or should the Government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada?”

    The other nine questions focused on immigration and constitutional changes. The first asked, “Do you support the Government of Alberta taking increased control over immigration for the purposes of decreasing immigration to more sustainable levels, prioritising economic migration and giving Albertans first priority on new employment opportunities?”

    The second question asked, “Do you support the Government of Alberta introducing a law mandating that only Canadian citizens, permanent residents and individuals with an Alberta-approved immigration status will be eligible for provincially-funded programs, such as health care, education and other social services?”

    The third question asked whether the provincial government should require non-permanent residents to live in Alberta for at least 12 months before qualifying for provincially funded social support programmes. It asked, “Assuming that all Canadian citizens and permanent residents continue to qualify for social support programs as they do now, do you support the Government of Alberta introducing a law requiring all individuals with a non-permanent legal immigration status to reside in Alberta for at least 12 months before qualifying for any provincially-funded social support programs?”

    The fourth question sought views on charging non-permanent residents for access to public health care and education. It asked, “Assuming that all Canadian citizens and permanent residents continue to qualify for public health care and education as they do now, do you support the Government of Alberta charging a reasonable fee or premium to individuals with a non-permanent immigration status living in Alberta for their and their family’s use of the healthcare and education systems?”

    The fifth question asked, “Do you support the Government of Alberta introducing a law requiring individuals to provide proof of citizenship, such as a passport, birth certificate or citizenship card, to vote in an Alberta provincial election?”

    The remaining questions dealt with constitutional matters and the distribution of powers between provincial and federal governments.

    The sixth question asked, “Do you support the Government of Alberta working with the governments of other willing provinces to amend the Canadian Constitution to have provincial governments, and not the federal government, select the justices appointed to provincial King’s Bench and Appeal courts?”

    The seventh question asked, “Do you support the Government of Alberta working with the governments of other willing provinces to amend the Canadian Constitution to abolish the unelected federal Senate?”

    The eighth question asked, “Do you support the Government of Alberta working with the governments of other willing provinces to amend the Canadian Constitution to allow provinces to opt out of federal programs that intrude on provincial jurisdiction such as health care, education, and social services, without a province losing any of the associated federal funding for use in its social programs?”

    The ninth question asked, “Do you support the Government of Alberta working with the governments of other willing provinces to amend the Canadian Constitution to better protect provincial rights from federal interference by giving a province’s laws dealing with provincial or shared areas of constitutional jurisdiction priority over federal laws when the province’s laws and federal laws conflict?”

    According to CBC, all 10 questions are non-binding, meaning the provincial government is not legally required to act on the results. There is also no minimum voter turnout required for the results to be considered valid.

    Ahead of the vote, CBC reported on differing perspectives among Albertans and Canadians with personal connections to the province, reflecting a range of views on whether Alberta should remain within Canada or pursue independence. (ANI)

    Add as Preferred on Google Follow on Google News Follow on Flipboard
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleKenya Ebola outbreak: India hands over second consignment of medical assistance
    Next Article Australia: Nagesh Singh performs Bhoomi Poojan for new High Commission building in Canberra
    Shivam Saini
    • Website

    Related Posts

    India and Kenya deepen maritime cooperation through joint training, professional exchanges in Mombasa

    October 29, 2026

    Flavio Bolsonaro claims he’s Brazil’s “elected president” after fleeing to US; Trump says he “won’t get involved”

    October 28, 2026

    Brazilian government downplays possible refusal by Trump, Milei to recognise Lula’s victory

    October 27, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Advertisement
    Demo
    Latest Posts

    Jaishankar meets Russian FM Lavrov in Atlanta, discusses Ukraine, West Asia situation

    EAM Jaishankar calls for “right to industrialise”, resisting predatory practices in supply chains at G20

    Israeli opposition leader Eisenkot sets conditions for coalition, vows to use Knesset majority to reverse Netanyahu policies

    Quad unveils AI, minerals and maritime plans

    Trending Posts
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Home
    • Asia
    • Exclusive
    • Europe
    • Pacific
    • Middle East
    • Others
    • Usa
    © 2026 GlobeFiles. Designed by SocialFox.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.